<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>zenoli.net &#187; music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zenoli.net/category/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zenoli.net</link>
	<description>High Weirdness in Low Places</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:50:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More Obsessiveness: Name That Tune</title>
		<link>http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/more-obsessiveness-name-that-tune/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/more-obsessiveness-name-that-tune/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peevishness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/more-obsessiveness-name-that-tune/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a change-up from audiobooks, I&#8217;ve lately been listening to a fair number of podcasts.  While working my way through the back archives of one show, I was struck by a dreadful piece of synthesized harpsichord music used to introduce one of the segments.  That is to say, it was a perfectly pleasant [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a change-up from <a href="http://www.zenoli.net/2007/02/history-and-commuting/">audiobooks</a>, I&#8217;ve lately been listening to a fair number of podcasts.  While working my way through the back archives of one show, I was struck by a dreadful piece of synthesized harpsichord music used to introduce one of the segments.  That is to say, it was a perfectly pleasant Baroque passage, but the rendering was, well, heinous.</p>
<p>While the synthesis of instruments has <a href="http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/publications/papers/jasp-harpsy/">greatly advanced</a> since the seventies, the person who coded up that harpsichord wasn&#8217;t even trying.  Worse, there were some seriously infelicities of timing, where whoever was playing the keyboard had stumbled slightly.</p>
<p>All of the above might be tolerated for a repetition or two, but after the twelfth or so I was contemplating ripping my (or perhaps someone else&#8217;s) ears off. Still, distressing as the synth harpsichord was, I had a worse source of dismay: I could not identify the composer.</p>
<p>The piece was extremely familiar, but I couldn&#8217;t slot it into any of my memories.  Bach? Telemann?   It was light and familiar, could it perhaps be Mozart? My recall system was coming up with nothing useful.</p>
<p>Clearly, surfing through <a href="http://www.sheetmusicarchive.net/single_listing.cfm?composer_id=2">PDFs of musical scores</a> was not going to be an efficient system of identification.  There&#8217;s been quite a bit of work done around<a href="http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/AudioFingerprint"> automatically identifying</a> particular recordings, such as that which resulted in the <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/02/27/hatto_piano_music_sc.html">unfortunate publicity</a> for the husband of late Joyce Hatto (he had been passing off other artists&#8217; recordings as hers).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I was working from a one-off synth rendering, so that approach was out.  Let&#8217;s see, it goes da-da-deedle-DAH-DAH-DAH-dah-dah-dah-dah.  What can I do with that?<br />
It turns out, rather a lot.  With the right website, you can leverage the memory a melody into an identification.  I found two sites that profess to identify music from a few notes: <a href="http://www.musipedia.org">Musipedia</a> and <a href="http://www.tuneteller.com">TuneTeller</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Musipedia.org</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.zenoli.net/wp-content/2007/03/musipedia.png" alt="Musipedia Interface" /></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have good luck with Musipedia, which was far too optimistic in its matching.  Its number-one suggestion (&#8220;The Poker Party Polka&#8221;) was not exactly what I remembered.  Nor was it &#8220;Blowin&#8217; in the Wind&#8221;, nor Verdi, nor Schubert, nor Bartók, nor any of the next fifty suggestions.  Musipedia was clearly not going to cut it.  I did try some of other forms of searching (contour and rhythm searches) without success.  Interestingly, they do have a &#8220;sing or whistle&#8221; search, but I was disenchanted with Musipedia by that point.</p>
<p><strong>TuneTeller.com</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.zenoli.net/wp-content/2007/03/tuneteller.png" alt="TuneTeller Interface" /></p>
<p>On the other hand, TuneTeller popped it up on the second try.  The first time, it complained because I had entered too much of the melody; it apparently works best with just a few bars.  Moments later, I had my <a href="http://tuneteller.com/cgi-bin/ttnew.cgi?notes=-1%201%202%20-2%20-12%204%203%200%20-2%200">answer</a>: it is a minuet by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boccherini">Luigi Boccherini</a>; in fact, just about the only piece he wrote which is still at all well-known.<br />
<img src="http://www.zenoli.net/wp-content/2007/03/boccherini-minuet.png" alt="Boccherini Minuet" /></p>
<p>Thanks to the Internet, I can sleep at night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/more-obsessiveness-name-that-tune/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

