<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Vagrant Book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/the-vagrant-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/the-vagrant-book/</link>
	<description>High Weirdness in Low Places</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 05:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/the-vagrant-book/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 19:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/the-vagrant-book/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>The very thought of having my books scattered around the globe gives me nightmares.  For a while, M------ and I had boxes in four locations across two states, and that was more than bad enough.  For that matter, it&#039;s bad enough having them in the attic!

I&#039;ve always been too tender-hearted for the serious, full-on cull that the book collection needs, but its day will be soon.  (Well, perhaps within the next four years, which is soon as these things go.)

I did survive my &lt;a href=&quot;/2007/01/book-disposal-the-horror/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent experience&lt;/a&gt; of actually throwing books into the trash, so I&#039;m getting closer to moving away from this bibliomaniacal &lt;i&gt;gloutonnerie&lt;/i&gt; toward a more measured &lt;i&gt;gourmandise&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very thought of having my books scattered around the globe gives me nightmares.  For a while, M&#8212;&#8212; and I had boxes in four locations across two states, and that was more than bad enough.  For that matter, it&#8217;s bad enough having them in the attic!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always been too tender-hearted for the serious, full-on cull that the book collection needs, but its day will be soon.  (Well, perhaps within the next four years, which is soon as these things go.)</p>
<p>I did survive my <a href="/2007/01/book-disposal-the-horror/" rel="nofollow">recent experience</a> of actually throwing books into the trash, so I&#8217;m getting closer to moving away from this bibliomaniacal <i>gloutonnerie</i> toward a more measured <i>gourmandise</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/the-vagrant-book/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 17:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenoli.net/2007/03/the-vagrant-book/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>You think that&#039;s bad? Try having books in different countries. Of course, there&#039;s always culling. I remember reading about a Victorian collector who refused to have anything bad on his shelves--thus he would dismember and re-bind the good parts of various Collected Works. For me, nostalgic attachment has long since ceased to be a valid criterion for book-possession. Out you go, &lt;em&gt;1984&lt;/em&gt;. Etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think that&#8217;s bad? Try having books in different countries. Of course, there&#8217;s always culling. I remember reading about a Victorian collector who refused to have anything bad on his shelves&#8211;thus he would dismember and re-bind the good parts of various Collected Works. For me, nostalgic attachment has long since ceased to be a valid criterion for book-possession. Out you go, <em>1984</em>. Etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

